Saturday, November 21, 2009

To Bow or Not to Bow (with dignity, that is....)

We Americans aren't trained in the proper art of bowing.  Apparently, there are different nuances and types of bows depending on the occasion.  And apparently, Obama keeps doing it wrong when he meets foreign leaders -- and he's humiliating himself and our nation in the process.

The worst part is that Obama clearly knows better.  Indeed, he has an entire State Department regime to brief him on customs, habits, and social graces, and to choreograph every moment of these meetings with foreign dignitaries.  Once might be an honest screw up, but twice?  Three times?  C'mon....

Here's a great post by Sean Linnane over at the Frum Forum blog (reproduced virtually in its entirety):

I spent more than half my life in the Orient. A common theme is the person of lower rank bows lower; how low he or she goes depends on the relative rank of the other person.


dick_cheney_with_japans_emperor


There is a whole dynamic going on with Obama’s bow--the President of the United States is equal (if not superior) to the Emperor of Japan. If Obama wanted to execute a courtesy bow, a slight bend forward at the waist followed by a slight nod of the head while maintaining eye contact would have been appropriate.


obama_bow_to_japanese_emperor


Westerners are not accustomed to bowing, and we are generally ignorant of the nuances of this custom. [But] [t]here is a right way and a wrong way to do it. What Obama did has the Japanese (and the rest of East Asia) rolling in fits of laughter, because it is the bow an employee gives to his boss, or a child gives to parents. He went WAY too low; it is only one step above a kow-tow.
Compare Obama’s bow with how he conducted himself in the company of the Queen of England, and then contrast this with the way he leaned forward to bow and scrape before the King of Saudi Arabia; this certainly leaves a lot of room to wonder about which direction this man’s sentiments lie.
I am an American. The only King I bow and pay homage to is Elvis.


obama_bows_to_saudi_king

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Surprise, surprise -- 10% of Obama's job claims are bogus...

More than 10% of the jobs the Obama administration claimed were "created or saved" by the stimulus package are doubtful or imaginary, according to reports compiled from eleven major newspapers and the Associated Press. (link)

(Hat tip to Michael Silence over at the No Silence Blog.)
 
 

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Local Partisan Primaries - What's Your Take?

Nice article by Bill Dries in the Memphis Daily News today touching on the issue of whether we should continue to have partisan primaries in local elections.

Some excerpts:

The partisan labels worked in favor of Republicans initially. But Democrats are heavily favored to take virtually every countywide office in the 2010 county elections.

Local GOP Chairman Lang Wiseman recently talked openly of abolishing the primaries, a decision that rests with the steering committee or executive committee of each local party.

“I haven’t reached any definite conclusions on it,” Wiseman told The Daily News. “My stance is that we need to start the conversation. … I think we’ve seen in recent years that it’s done more harm than good.”

County Commissioner Matt Kuhn, a former chairman of the local Democratic Party, joined the call during last week’s commission deadlock.

“I do not think that there is a Republican or Democrat way to be in local office,” he said.



****

“As Democrats, I tell you that that’s probably a good idea,” Kuhn said of the concept to abolish the local primaries. “For years, we’ve felt we had to do it. … They’ve been divisive. They’ve been excessively divisive. I believe that we have an opportunity this year to maybe change that.”

Wiseman said he intends to put together a discussion group before his party goes one way or the other.

“I think that you wind up deterring a lot of good people from service who might otherwise want to serve. And I think that unfortunately instead of the affiliation being a positive thing for people, it ends up almost being like a blackball effect,” Wiseman said. “I think that’s borne itself out particularly in the issue of interim mayor.”

I can understand and appreciate both sides of this issues, which is why I think we need to have a candid and deliberate discussion on the question.  With all due respect to Commission Kuhn, I do think it matters whether you are a Republican or a Democrat.  However, in our current political environment in Memphis/Shelby County, I'm not sure whether -- on balance -- labels do more harm than good.

What's your take?




Monday, November 16, 2009

Your take? Ford, Gibson or None of the Above?

Our County Commission is scheduled to vote on the interim mayor again tomorrow afternoon.  Zack McMillan wrote a nice piece in the Memphis Commercial Appeal yesterday laying out the issues and the landscape.

I want to know your take on things.  Should it be Joe Ford, J.W. Gibson, or none of the above?

Or do you prefer the gridlock to persist in order to keep the status quo?  Is there a compromise candidate you'd like to see?  George Flinn? Jack Sammons? Harold Byrd? Joyce Avery? Myron Lowery?

Or somebody else perhaps?
 

Sunday, November 15, 2009

No Fear...

So do not fear, for I am with you;
do not be dismayed, for I am your God.
I will strengthen you and help you;
I will uphold you with my righteous right hand.



-- Isaiah 41:10 (NIV)

_______________________________________

Don't be afraid. I am with you.
Don't tremble with fear.
I am your God.
I will make you strong,
as I protect you with my arm
and give you victories.

-- Isaiah 41:10 (Contemporary English Version)
 
 

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

"Tear Down This Wall" -- a.k.a. Saying What Needs to be Said

Sometimes you just have to say what needs to be said.

But did you know that there was much internal debate about whether Reagan should actually go so far as to actually challenge Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall?  Click here to read an interesting WSJ article about how Reagan bucked many of his advisors who pleaded with him not to risk the potential embarrassment of a hopelessly demanding that the wall be torn down.

What a valuable lesson!  Sometimes you have put aside petty politics and the fear of failure, and simply be willing to take risks in the name of standing up for what's right.  

Sometimes you just have to say what needs to be said. 
  
 

November 10, 2009 -- Sam turns 9!!

I wrote this last year on Sam's birthday and couldn't think of a way to say it any better this year:



2008:
My sweet baby boy is 8 years old today! It's hard to believe that 8 whole years have passed since Sam was so ready to meet the world that he rushed in 6 weeks early.

Ever since I first saw him I knew he was special. He has the sweetest, most genuine, and most caring heart I've ever witnessed in a person. Indeed, he is oftentimes more of an example to me than I am to him.

Sam is a wonderful son whose gentle and sincere spirit is infectious. Everyone who meets him -- adults and children alike -- just naturally gravitate toward him.  He is a rare gift from God, and he will grow up to be a wonderful man who will accomplish many great things.


2009
Sam is 9 years old today!! Seems unreal to think he's that old already!  


Sam -- you are a wonderful young man and I love you very much!!  Happy Happy Happy Birthday!!!!!
  
  

Friday, November 6, 2009

Quotes

"Progress always involves risks. You can’t steal second base and keep your foot on first."
--Frederick B. Wilcox

"Woman begins by resisting a man's advances and ends by blocking his retreat."
--Oscar Wild

[Thanks to Abby Braddock for sending me these quotes.]
 

Political Math

Political Edition:
Creating Dependency ≠ True Compassion
Taxing Others ≠ True Benevolence

Sports Edition:
UT Football + Memphis Football = Beatdown in Knoxville

[Political Math is a regular series which includes reader submissions. So let me hear your ideas! Make submissions and I'll publish some of the more creative ones and, of course, give you appropriate credit. You can send them to me at langwiseatty at AOL.com. Of course, use normal Email nomenclature with the @ symbol -- I spelled it out that way only to avoid auto-spammers.]

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Want to Meet Tennessee's Next Governor?

Multiple Choice Question:
What do the following Republican contenders have in common?

  • Shelby County District Attorney Bill Gibbons
  • Knoxville Mayor Bill Haslam
  • Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey
  • Congressman Zach Wamp

Choices:
A)  They're all fine men with impressive credentials.
B)  One of them will be the next Governor of the State of Tennessee.
C)  You can have dinner with all of them on Friday, November 13th
D)  All of the above.

Answer:  D -- All of the above.

"Pasta and Politics" is hosted by the Northeast Shelby Republican Club on Friday, November 13th at 7 p.m. at the Memphis Area Home Builder’s Association, 776 N. Germantown Road near Trinity.

Tickets are only $40 per person and can be purchased online at www.NEShelbyGOP.org, or you can call Club President Lee Mills at 901-592-5424.
 

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Rapper Ludacris....Conservative?

I've posted recently about the rise in independent voters and the country leaning right-of-center as a whole. Well, check out this interesting article over at FrumForum (fka New Majority) about a speech by popular rapper/actor Ludacris in which he (intentionally or unintentionally) touched on the virtues of some conservative principles.

Some excerpts:

This past weekend, hip-hop artist Christopher Bridges [aka Ludacris] came to Washington, D.C. to fundraise and lift awareness for his charitable organization. I’ve searched high and low, and after seeing him speak, I’m ecstatic to say that I’ve finally found a popular conservative rapper.

Popular rappers tend to rap about liberal issues. ... This is why it’s so refreshing to finally find a rapper who, while not identifying as a conservative, is acting and talking like one.

At a televised luncheon at the National Press Club on Friday, Ludacris started his speech by calling for a “paradigm shift” towards leadership “that is very basic and that starts with self.” Self-ownership and personal responsibility being conservative principles, this piqued my interest.

But wait, there’s more! In words that might well have come from the mouth of Newt Gingrich, Ludacris spoke about the inadequacies of the welfare state:



Our communities need fixing; our systems are badly broken. We can’t wait on the government, their institutions, social programming and policies alone to fix our communities. We have to look at other sources… people are looking in a different direction for philanthropic leadership.

With the substance (but perhaps not the style) of Mark Levin, Ludacris continued with a description of the work of his foundation. The rapper said:



We give a hand up; we don’t give a hand out. I only like to help people that want to help themselves, not people that are just going to… take advantage of the situation.

Of course, Ludacris would never actually call himself a conservative – that would ruin him. So on Saturday night, while the 6th Annual Ludacris Foundation Dinner was being held at the Ronald Reagan Building in downtown D.C., comedian Joe Clair joked about how unsuitable it was to host Ludacris in a “Republican temple”:




Limbaugh’s gonna call you tonight. He is blogging right now. He can’t believe it. They are having a Ludacris Foundation dinner in a sacred building … ’cause you know this is the Republican temple. When we’re not here, they have Republican church in here.


But who knows? Based on his comments at the National Press Club the day before, Luda could fit in quite well with the Republican Party. Conservative rappers, stand up!

This is both heartening and disheartening all at the same time.  Indeed, there are countless Americans who believe in conservative principles, and yet who nonetheless identify themselves as Democrats.  And, yes, this includes many African-Americans.

The problem, of course, is that we Republicans haven't done a good enough job of fostering an environment where so-called independents and new faces are valued.  As I've stated in previous posts, we should not moderate our principles; however, we need do need to moderate our tone.  We cannot prosper as a Party in these times by maintaining an environment where being identified as a Republican is socially unacceptable in certain circles.




Sunday, November 1, 2009

Right-Wing Women Rock

Check out this hilarious column by Ian Robinson from the Calgary Sun.

The conservative slogan:  "Come for the culture war ... stay for the chicks."
  • Left-wing drabs recycle. Right-wing women shop -- and the government measures how much they shop every month to find out whether we're still in a recession. Basically, the world economy depends on right-wing women buying shoes.
  • Left-wing women burn enormous quantities of fossil fuels to drive across the city to a farmer's market to purchase virtually the same carrot you can get at the neighbourhood Sobey's a couple of blocks from your house for half the price, all in the name of making the environment happy.
  • And when that plate of food is put in front of you by the right-wing hottie you had the good sense to marry, it will be 100% tofu-free. If you're lucky, she just remembered to buy steak and forgot about the carrot entirely.
  • And in case you're not convinced, to indicate the utter superiority of the right-wing woman over the left-wing variant ... just turn on The View.  The left has Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg.  We've got Elisabeth Hasselbeck.  Checkmate.
For all my liberal friends, don't get too up in arms -- the article is written tongue-in-cheek.  Sort of.  Maybe....

[Thanks to Betsy Carnesale for forwarding me the article.]

Saturday, October 31, 2009

More on the Rise in Independent Voters

I posted on this topic yesterday.  However, there's more recent evidence/data noted in this WSJ article from last week indicating that "[t]he fastest-growing political group in America is 'none of the above.'" 


Some info/excerpts:
  • A Washington Post/ABC News survey released this week found that 42% identified themselves as political independents, compared to only 33% Democrat and 20% Republican. 
  • The independent share has jumped 8% since August alone.
  • The latest Pew Research survey from earlier this month found that 37% identified themselves as independents, up from 33% at the beginning of the year. Democratic and Republican affiliation both have dropped over the same period. 
  • In the Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, the share of Americans calling themselves "strictly independent" rose to 22% in the latest survey from 18% in early summer. Throw in "leaners" -- those who say they are independent but lean toward either the Republican or Democratic party -- and the growth rose to 43% from 37% in June.

Of course, the biggest question raised by the WSJ article is "whether [this trend] is a temporary snapshot of the electorate -- as some voters who shifted to the Democrats last year begin their journey back to the Republican column -- or whether it represents a botched opportunity by Republicans to take advantage of the troubles Democrats are experiencing."

The current state of affairs?

"Certainly there's no sign yet that Republicans are benefiting. To the contrary, Pew polling has found that the share of Americans identifying themselves as Republicans at its lowest point in 30 years. Maybe that's because only 24% now say they approve of the job GOP leaders are doing, their worst approval rating for them in 15 years."


"Democratic leaders don't fare much better, of course; they were getting relatively high ratings in the first half of 2009, but their approval rating of 33% represents a return to levels seen in 2008, before the age of Obama."

So it's apparently still up for grabs.  And I said yesterday, both parties can ignore these trends at their own peril.
 
 

Friday, October 30, 2009

The Rise of Independent Voters -- Parties Ignore at Your Own Peril

Interesting WSJ article from late last year detailing the rise of independent voters.

In 1954, the number of people who identified themselves as independent was 22%.  Today that number is almost double (43%), with 47% describing themselves as "centrists."  I suspect those numbers are even higher here in Shelby County.

If we ignore these trends, and if we fail to adapt, we do so at our own peril.

Having said all that, there's good news -- if not great news! -- for Republicans in the numbers.   From the article:

Professional partisans in Washington try to ignore this shift, perpetuating the myth that the independent movement is a chaotic grab bag. In fact, the movement has a coherent set of underlying beliefs: Independents tend to be fiscally conservative, socially progressive and strong on national security. They believe in putting patriotism over partisanship and the national interest over special interests.

These are precisely Republican principles.  Indeed, the data is simply further evidence that we tend to be right-of-center as a nation -- which is good for Republicans on the merits of most issues.  However, we must put ourselves in a better position to capitalize on these trends.  In my judgment this includes, among other things, doing a better job of managing our tone lest we rev up what amounts to an ever-shrinking base at the expense of the independent voter.  We must also hold our own elected officials accountable to conservative principles.

In short, then, we must not moderate our principles; however, we must moderate our tone.

Some other worthwhile excerpts from the article:
Throughout the 1990s, the independent movement kept growing while Democrats and Republicans warred in Washington. Three independent governors were elected: Angus King of Maine, Lowell Weicker of Connecticut and Jesse Ventura of Minnesota. All spread the same essential reform message: independence from special interests guided by a common-sense balance of fiscal conservatism and social liberalism.

The momentum continued this decade with the election of Sen. Joe Lieberman, New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg, and the independent-in-all-but-name California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

This is the new mainstream in American politics, and it's growing among younger voters. More than 40% of college undergraduates identify themselves as independents, according to a summer 2008 survey by Harvard University's Institute of Politics (IOP). "Half of young Americans do not identify with traditional party or ideological labels -- they are the new center in American politics," says John Della Volpe of IOP.

This trend extends to 30- to 45-year-old Generation X voters as well, says the author of "X Saves the World," Jeff Gordinier: "Gen Xers tend to be pretty post-ideological and pragmatic, there is less allegiance to any one party or any one way of thinking."

For Americans who've grown accustomed to hundreds of cable channels and unlimited choices on the Internet, politics is the last place people are expected to be satisfied with a choice between Brand A and Brand B.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Political Math

Courtesy of my friend Kimberley Eppes:


Re-runs of The View = Viable Method of Torture at Gitmo
Harry Reid's Whining = Viable Method of Torture at Gitmo
Michael Moore Videos = Viable Method of Torture at Gitmo


[Kimberley -- please accept my apologies for the slight alterations.  I thought each of these items alone constituted torture -- no need to add them all together in order to reach such a designation. :)]

[Political Math is a regular series which includes reader submissions. So let me hear your ideas! Make submissions and I'll publish some of the more creative ones and, of course, give you appropriate credit. You can send them to me at langwiseatty at AOL dot com. Of course, use normal Email nomenclature -- I spelled it out that way only to avoid auto-spammers.]


Monday, October 26, 2009

A Rose is a Rose is a Rose (a.k.a. How stupid does Pelosi really think people are?)

So this is the latest bright idea courtesy of Nancy Pelosi?  Just rename the "public option" something a little more catchy and maybe it'll sell better?

According to AP today:   
A government-sponsored "public option" for health care lives, though it may be more attractive to skeptics if it goes by a different moniker, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Monday.

In an appearance at a Florida senior center, the Democratic leader referred to the so-called public option as "the consumer option." Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., appeared by Pelosi's side and used the term "competitive option."

Both suggested new terminology might get them past any lingering doubts among the public — or consumers or competitors.

It's really enlightening to know what Democrats really think of the general citizenry.  I mean, do they really think people are that stupid?  Is this the best they can come up with?
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What's in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;

   -- Shakespeare, from Romeo and Juliet
 
 

Political Math

Courtesy of Debbie Wiseman:


Republicans - Basic Republican Values = Our Current Sorry State of Affairs

Memphis - Herenton + Wharton = We'll See


[Political Math is a regular series which includes reader submissions. So let me hear your ideas! Make submissions and I'll publish some of the more creative ones and, of course, give you appropriate credit. You can send them to me at langwiseatty at AOL dot com. Of course, use normal Email nomenclature -- I spelled it out that way only to avoid auto-spammers.]


D.C. Fantasy Math -- Budget Trickery in the Healthcare Debate

Great Read: Blog post over at New Majority by former Director of the Congressional Budget Office about all of the false assumptions and silly game playing that goes in Washington generally -- and more specifically dealing with the fantasy math in the healthcare proposals.

Creating a massive entitlement program with -- magically -- no discernible financial impact?  Yeah right....

Only in Washington can people utter such nonsense with a straight face.

Some interesting excerpts:
More recently, the CBO put out its “score” of the Baucus bill indicating that it cost under $900 billion, reduced the deficit over the next ten years, and did not create a new long-run fiscal imbalance. This seemed a bit odd (a euphemism for “completely batshit”) since the bill assumed that doctors would be subjected in two years to a cut in their Medicare reimbursements of over 20 percent. (As we have since seen, dropping this fiction would cost $250 billion, putting the real price tag over $1 trillion.)


It also assumed that future Congresses would steadily reduce Medicare spending to the tune of one-half trillion dollars, something that has never (did I mention never) happened. Instead, previous attempts of this sort (the 1997 Balanced Budget Act) were quickly reversed. And you would think that CBO might have mentioned the schizophrenic sleaziness of creating a new, large health entitlement spending program by promising to cut the previous large health entitlement spending program that had never been reined in. Nope.


****


ou may see a pattern developing. The Senate Finance Committee undertakes political economy malpractice, but the CBO does not mention it. There is a good reason: It can’t. The statutes governing the budget process require that CBO compute the budgetary consequences of the written proposal. It cannot judge the intent of the current Congress, the likely actions of a future Congress, or the virtues of the proposals. Its job is to elucidate the budgetary consequences of the proposal, bill or law as written.


Put simply, if the Senate Finance Committee drafts a budgetary fantasy, CBO will have to score it. If I had a CBO, I could send it my plan for next year: make $5 million a month and buy a 50-room mansion with a national debt clock on every wall. I’m sure they would be able to say, “yep, this balances”. But that doesn’t mean it will happen. The same is true of the current healthcare reform fantasies.
  
  

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Call Before You Dig

In my work as as a lawyer, I often get to see the results of damaged utility lines -- gas, electric, water, phone, and cable.  I've handled everything from serious injury claims from an emergency situation, all the way to the cost of the damaged utility line itself.

It happens A LOT more often than you might think -- which is why I decided to write this blog post.   The most unfortunate part, though, is that it doesn't even have to happen at all.

One of the most surprising aspects for the homeowner is that not only does he potentially put himself in harm's way while he's merely out digging a fence post hole, or laying an irrigation line, or digging a hole for a driveway basketball goal, etc. -- he ends up going to the mailbox in a few weeks to find a bill for the the time/cost of the crew who came out to fix things.

And guess what?!  I can assure you from experience that the cost of an entire utility crew responding to an emergency call ain't cheap!!  Further, it isn't exactly a bill you can afford to ignore -- that is, assuming you like having things like electricity and gas at your home!

The good news is that there's an easy solution -- simply call Tennessee One Call at 811 (kinda like 911) at least 72 hours before you dig.  All major utility companies will then be notified of your request and then have a duty to come out to your property and mark all of the utility lines on your property (usually with spray paint) -- referred to as "locating" your lines.  The locate request is then valid for 15 days, although it can be renewed for longer periods if needed.

The benefit of having a valid locate is that if you strike a utility line that isn't properly marked -- viola! -- you don't have to pay the bill!!  It's on the utility company.

So be sure to call before you dig!!

[More info on the Tennessee One Call system here.]
 
    

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Political Math

Courtesy of my friend Kimberley Eppes:


Hope + Change = Grab a Mop

[Political Math is a regular series which includes reader submissions. So let me hear your ideas! Make submissions and I'll publish some of the more creative ones and, of course, give you appropriate credit. You can send them to me at langwiseatty at AOL dot com. Of course, use normal Email nomenclature -- I spelled it out that way only to avoid auto-spammers.]

Friday, October 23, 2009

New Word of the Day - Trimorrow

Taking a break for some lighthearted fare:

Here's a submission I made to the Urban Dictionary that was accepted and published:


1.trimorrowlove it hate it
The day after tomorrow.

Today = Day 1
Tomorrow = Day 2 (as in, Two-Morrow)
Trimorrow = Day 3 (as in, Tri-Morrow)
If it's Saturday and you're talking to a friend who doesn't realize the Dallas Cowboy game is the Monday Night Football game instead of a regular Sunday game, you might say to him, "Dude, the Cowboy game is trimorrow, not tomorrow."

"Never put off today what you can do trimorrow."

Just you wait--everybody will be saying it soon!  And you'll have me to thank for it.  Ha!
 
 

Apparently I'm Not the Only One

I posted yesterday and Wednesday about Councilman Joe Brown, wondering aloud whether and when the Democrat establishment would call him out about his race-baiting nonsense.  Some commenters attempted to minimize if not defend Brown, but apparently I'm not the only one who sees the value in calling Brown out regarding this divisive nonsense.

From my liberal friend Steve Steffens over at his Left Wing Cracker blog:

While I'm grousing about Wharton, let me kick it up a notch. Mr. Mayor, why did you not give Steve Ross the courtesy of a vote before the Council on Tuesday? If he loses, he loses, but it's HIS loss, not yours. Let the chips fall where they may. If, as a trial lawyer, you have seen far worse than the brawl between The Punk Joe Brown and Shea Flinn, why did you roll over so quickly?

Do you think The Punk Joe Brown didn't notice? Do you honestly think he won't keep doing this, now that he sees that, despite all of our criticism for his Punkness, he got what he wanted? Prepare to keep getting rolled, Mr. Mayor, they're not as deferential on the west side of the Plaza as they were on the east side, they FIGHT over here.

Sidney Chism was right, you ARE going to have to piss people off and take stands now, or you will be in a quagmire of which you may find difficult to extricate yourself. Welcome to the big leagues, Mayor Wharton.

Liberal blog 55-40 Memphis picked up on that same quote here, calling the quote "so true."

We're still waiting.....

Thursday, October 22, 2009

More Political Math

Reality TV Wannabe + Balloon Boy + Hyper Media = Jail Time 


This equation comes courtesy of my good friend, Tom Guleff, over at the Joe Citizens blog.


[Political Math is a regular series which includes reader submissions.  So let me hear your ideas!  Make submissions and I'll publish some of the more creative ones and, of course, give you appropriate credit.  You can send them to me at langwiseatty at AOL dot com. Of course, use normal Email nomenclature -- I spelled it out that way only to avoid auto-spammers.]
  
  

More Scuttlebutt on "Brown Outs"

I posted yesterday about Memphis City Councilman Joe Brown's outrageous race-baiting outburst during Monday's Council session in which objected to local blogger Steve Ross being named to the Metro Charter Commission (in part based on the fact that Ross is one of those evil blogger types). 

My post wondered aloud whether we'd see how Democrats would respond.

Well, yesterday's blogosphere was all atwitter (pun intended) about the incident.  To his credit, my friend and liberal Memphis blogger Steve Steffens quickly and roundly denounced Brown's idiocy, and he likewise posted a good summary of links to the various blogs all across the state that tackled the subject yesterday.  Indeed, the story produced quite a bit of cyber-debate -- some of which I want to address.

(Before doing that, though, I would note that still no one in the Democrat establishment has stepped up to address this issue -- at least to my knowledge.)

The "Take on Things" Over in Knoxville
Michael Silence's blog over in Knoxville is a must-read for statewide politicos.  I read it most everyday.  His take was interesting in the sense that it focused on Brown's slurring of a blogger.  He wrote in pertinent part that:

Lang Wiseman: Playing on Brown's own words -- is this guy for real? Democrats -- he's on your team. What say you?

With all do respect, this is not a partisan issue. It's an issue of a public official disrespecting someone active in his community. And it's an issue of disrespecting a forum where people voice their opinions. So it seems to me it's also an issue where people need to take off their red- or blue-tinted glasses. Government dissing citizen participation knows no party lines.

To which I commented on his post (in partial agreement) as follows:

Agreed. However, there is also a partisan element to this to be sure. It's about accountability, policing one of your own, and sending the right message.

Remember that we live in a different world over here on this side of the state, and that the overtones of Brown's comments (and not to mention the historical significance to Memphians of the precise words he chose) are so divisive, and so race-baiting that it demands -- at least in my view -- to be addressed by those in his own Party.
We are at a unique time here. A potential crossroads and potential time of healing in this community. We just rid ourselves of one of the most divisive, race-on-his-sleeve Mayors in recent history (at least in his latter years), and the timing of Brown's comments could not be worse as we move into a new administration whose central campaign theme basically amounted to a pledge of unity and change -- "One Memphis."

Brown's words need to addressed and condemned by people of influence within his own Party who have credibility with his constituency -- not just because his words slandered bloggers and/or notions of dissent -- but because they strike at the heart of the hopefulness that people finally feel in moving forward.

The Comments on My Own Blog Post
What surprised me most, though, were the comments to my own blog post seemingly defending Brown's racial tactics, and attempting to call me out at the same time.  Interesting enough, in fact, that I wanted to reproduce the exchange here:

Anonymous said...
To quote the great, all-knowing Lang Wiseman, "I'll offer to make a deal with my democrat friends--if ya'll don't ask me to defend the video of a few ignorant, so-called conservatives, then I won't ask you to defend the videos showing the stupidity of ya'lls voters either." [Aside: a reference to my recent "Let's Make a Deal" post.] Well, in this case, words of an elected official. What say you Lang? What say you?

Oct 21, 2009 3:17:00 PM
Lang Wiseman said...
Nice try. And thanks for the compliment (although I'm sure you didn't mean it that way).

Anyway, he ain't some random voter picked off the street corner. It's different. We can't be expected to defend every yahoo who claims to be a member of a political party -- on either side.

But this guy is somebody who's a leader -- who holds himself out as a Democrat and who was elected by Democrats as such. This ain't some yahoo holding up a sign.

As I said -- nice try.

Anonymous said...
I know you're a lawyer and your job is to defend your point, but you are totally being hypocritical with that post. The first poster totally called you on it and you back-pedaled to no avail. We could play the name game all day long. Mark Sanford, George Bush, essentially any politician from South Carolina, etc. Politicians aren't perfect people, thanks for pointing that out. Got it.

Oct 21, 2009 6:12:00 PM
Lang Wiseman said...
No backpedaling here, friend.

The distinction I made is a valid one. Nobody can be expected to go running around calling out each and every wackjob on the planet who claims to be a member of their political party.

When that person is one of our leaders, though -- and purports to represent and speak for us -- then sometimes the Party establishment needs to step up and say what's what.

Mark Sanford? If I were in S.C. I'd be in the front of the parade calling for that jackass to step down. Remember, friend, I speak with credibility on this issue. When Paul Stanley's antics were put out there in the light of day, I was the very first person to call for him to resign. Look it up.

http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2009/jul/27/shelby-county-gop-chairman-calls-stanley-step-down/

It's not about politicians being perfect. But this type of race-baiting by Joe Brown is way, way, way over the top. It's even more troubling here at this unique time in history -- the very first public meeting of the council with soon-to-be Mayor Wharton sitting right there after running on a hopeful them of unity and change: "One Memphis"

People need to know that that meant something -- if it did.

Tom Guleff said...
Joe Brown welcomes you to CrazyLand.

I stand by my point...
 

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

"Brown Outs" on the Memphis City Council

Interesting thoughts about Memphis City Councilman Joe Brown here and here:

From the Smart City Memphis Blog:
[E]ven his fellow Council members, who’ve heard any awful lot of circular reasoning and race-baiting from Councilman Brown, were shaking their heads over his flight at warp speed into a parallel universe. One wag has taken to calling such moments “Brown-outs,” or short circuits that shut down the system.

To punctuate his outrage over the Council’s consideration of Memphian Steve Ross as a member of the Memphis and Shelby County Metropolitan Government Charter Commission, Councilman Brown shouted at Mr. Flinn: “I'm a real black man. I hope you're a real white man."

Playing on Brown's own words -- is this guy for real?

Democrats -- he's on your team.  What say you?
 

Political Math

The Freakonomics blog that I regularly read has periodic posts entitled "New Math" featuring Craig Damrauer.  The series gave me the idea for what I'll call Political Math.  The first installment was included at the bottom of yesterday's post:

Ignorance + Handouts + No Skin in the Game = Hard Cycle to Break

Today's installment is as follows:

Good Intentions + Failed Policy ≠ Compassion

[Please let me hear your ideas.  Make submissions of your own and I'll republish the good ones and attribute them to you!  You can send them to me at langwiseatty at AOL dot com.  Of course, use normal Email nomenclature -- I spelled it out that way only to avoid auto-spammers.]
 
 

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Unbelievable...1 Child Dead and No Regrets?

There are simply no words to describe how sad and how angry this news story and video makes me feel. 

A 3 year old child is dead and a 2 year old is critically wounded from a house fire yesterday in Memphis that occurred after the boys' aunt and mother left them home alone.  And then the aunt goes on camera to be interviewed -- at the fire scene of all places! -- and states that she doesn't have any regrets about leaving them there alone. 

Say what?!

In fact, she literally chuckles during the interview and says that what she really needs to do is get back inside to see whether her purse and food stamp card got burned up.

What has this world come to?

Obama...The Verb (aka The Latest Award)

Reported by no less than Democrat George Stephanopolous, Japanese college students have apparently coined a new verb playing on the President's name -- and it ain't exactly flattering.

Having said that, they seem to have hit the nail on the head.

From GS's blog:

Jim Fallows points to reports that a new verb is popping up in Japanese college students’ conversations: obamu (literally “to Obama”).  One blog offers a definition:

obamu: (v.) To ignore inexpedient and inconvenient facts or realities, think “Yes we can, Yes we can,” and proceed with optimism using those facts as an inspiration (literally, as fuel). It is used to elicit success in a personal endeavor. One explanation holds that it is the opposite of kobamu. (which means to refuse, reject, or oppose).

Sometimes it takes a certain level of distance and detachment to see things clearly....
 

Financial Illiteracy -- A Huge Burden to Rational Debate

From the Freakonomics blog review of a research paper describing the alarming rate of financial illiteracy among young adults in the U.S.:

[F]ewer than one-third of young adults possess basic knowledge of interest rates, inflation, and risk diversification.

So -- conversely speaking, then -- more than than 67% of people have no knowledge of basic, fundamental economics?!  Are you serious?  No wonder emotional rhetoric is so successful compared to rational discussion of economic realities.

Couple this with the notion that almost 50% of the population pays $0 in taxes, and yet clamors for more and more government handouts, and it's easy to see that the problem of big government is slowly becoming structural in nature.

Ignorance + Handouts + No Skin in the Game = Hard Cycle to Break
  
  

Monday, October 19, 2009

Random Quotes

Those who follow regularly know I like quotes:

"If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, and do more and become more, you are a leader."
-- John Quincy Adams

"Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself."
-- Leo Tolstoy

"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results."
--Benjamin Franklin
 
 
 
Add to Technorati Favorites

Web Site Visitor Counters
Flower Delivery